|
![[Under Construction]](images/undercon.gif)
| |
Myths
about the Canadian single payor system got their start decades ago, and
don’t reflect current realities like the erosion of Medicare, which two
decades ago feature a ratio of 75% governmental care to 25% private care. That
ratio is now 68.7% to 31.3% and private expenditures are expected to grow by
5% annually as the government share declines and is privatized.
Even Canadian health care researchers are waving red flags before their
own politicians about the ignorance on the state of their health care system.
Governor King’s Blue Ribbon Commission relied on the testimony of just one
‘expert’ on Canada’s system and never even cited the main repository of
statistics, the Canadian Institute for Health Information. It has a complete
data warehouse that could have been easily mined for accurate data.
Their graphs even incorporate forecasts. For example, one revealed that the
escalating costs would make health care expenses 40% of the Provincial budget
within a few years! It seems as if Maine's 'Blue Ribbon Commission' members
either omitted these forecasts or were ignorant about them.
(Preliminary
Provincial/Territorial Government Health Expenditure as a Proportion of Total Provincial Government Programs,
Canada, 1974/1975 to 2000/2001 - Current Dollars)
Proponents & endorsements of Canada's Health care system
 |
OH
CANADA! An unabashed, socialist, series of opinion pieces on the
joys and benefits of the Canadian health care system. Somewhat dated, circa
2000.
|

Canadian Health Policy 'think tanks'
 | This
is the source for timely, detailed, accurate information with forecasts,
i.e. the skyrocketing costs of health care by Province.
|
 |
FRASER
INSTITUTE. "The Institute is exploring how market incentives within
the public health care system, such as medical savings accounts, can improve
the quality of care for all Canadians. Reform of the current public system
could also encourage private investment and medical innovation, create
employment, and increase the range and quality of health care
available."
|
 |
Atlantic Institute for Market Studies
(AIMS)
" Health care is the most hotly debated public policy
issue in Canada. There is no question that, whatever results, the current
debate will have a significant impact on the Atlantic region. In
an effort to allow people to explore this issue for themselves AIMS has
constructed this resource page on health care. Here you will find a direct
link to AIMS major project called Health Care’s Hidden Face: The
Private Sector and its Relationship with Medicare. By following that
link you can take a direct part in our ongoing research by reading and
commenting on a series of working papers related to health care"
|

Media commentary and other criticism
 | The
Canadian media tend to report the ‘crisis’ as it affects each provincial
government, and depending upon the bent of their political leadership, effect
varying solutions to the problem. Here is one report in a national E’zine of
Canada’s First Health Care
REPORT CARD, by Michael Decter,
Ph.D. Harvard.
|
 |
|
 |
|
 | Provincial
Governments move health care into private sector and induce competition...
Doer
says provinces must do part for health care,
by Globe & Mail, March
6th, 2002.
|
 |
|
|